Publication Ethics

Penuh Asa: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal as well as allegations of research errors, including the author, editor-in-chief, editorial board, peer-reviewers and publisher. Study Elementary School Teacher Education Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines

Publication of an article in peer-reviewed Penuh Asa: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support it. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.

Study program for Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education As the publisher of the Hopeful Student Journal: Primary School Teacher Education takes its duty of trusteeship over all stages of publishing very seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue does not impact or influence editorial decisions.

Alleged Research Breach

Research error means fabrication, falsification, manipulation of citations, or plagiarism in producing, conducting, or reviewing research and writing articles by authors, or in reporting research results. When an author is found to be involved in research error or other serious misconduct involving articles that have been published in a scientific journal, the Editor has the responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

In cases of suspected violations, the Editor and Editorial Board will use COPE best practices to help them resolve complaints and deal with the violation fairly. This will include an investigation into allegations by the Editor. Submitted manuscripts found to contain such errors will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such errors, a retraction may be issued and will be linked to the original article.

The first step involves determining the validity of the conjecture and assessing whether the conjecture is consistent with the definition of a research offence. This initial step also involves determining whether the individual suspected of committing the violation has a relevant conflict of interest.

If scientific error or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the conjecture is shared with the relevant author, who, on behalf of all co-authors, is asked to provide a detailed response. Once the responses have been received and evaluated, additional review and expert involvement (such as a statistical reviewer) can be obtained. For cases where infringement is unlikely, a clarification, additional analysis, or both, issued as a letter to the editor, and often including a notice of correction and correction in the published article is sufficient.

Institutions are expected to carry out appropriate and thorough investigations into alleged scientific violations. Ultimately, authors, journals and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of scientific records. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific errors, and taking necessary actions based on an evaluation of the matter, such as correction, repeal with replacement, and repeal, Penuh Asa: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar will continue to fulfill its responsibility to ensure the validity and integrity of scientific records.

Publication Decision

Penuh Asa: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar responsible for deciding which articles submitted to journals should be published. The validation of the work and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive those decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Complaints and Appeals

Penuh Asa: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar will have clear procedures for dealing with complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board, or Publisher. The complaint will be clarified to an honorable person related to the complaint case. The scope of complaints includes everything related to journal business processes, namely editorial processes, manipulation of found citations, unfair editors/reviewers, manipulation of peer-reviews, etc. Complaint cases will be processed according to COPE guidelines.

Fair State

Editors at all times evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.


Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the appropriate authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript may not be used in an editor's research without the written consent of the author.
Reviewer Task

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.


Any selected Editor who feels unqualified to review research reported in a manuscript or knows that its rapid review is not possible must notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Standar Objektivitas

The review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Editors must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. A reviewer should also call the editor's attention if there are substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, cooperative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.

Author Assignment

Reporting standards

Authors of original research reports must present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be presented accurately in the paper. Papers must contain sufficient detail and references to enable others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are required to provide raw data with respect to papers for editorial review, and must be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and must, in any case, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable period thereafter. publication. The author is responsible for the reproducibility of the data.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors of articles must ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been properly cited or cited.

Multiple Publication

An author may not, in general, publish manuscripts describing substantially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Source Acknowledgment

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite influential publications in determining the nature of the work reported.

Article Writing and Contributor

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the study being reported. Everyone who has made a significant contribution should be listed as a co-author.

Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

Corresponding authors must ensure that all suitable co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are listed in the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have approved its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the editor of the journal or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the article.

Ethical Oversight

If the research work involves chemicals, people, animals, procedures, or equipment that have unusual hazards inherent in their use, authors must clearly identify these in the manuscript to comply with the ethical conduct of research using both animal and human subjects. If required, the Author must provide legal and ethical clearance from a legal association or organization.

If the research involves confidential data and business/marketing practices, the author must clearly justify this whether the data or information will be safely hidden or not.