Studi Pemanfaatan Literatur Primer pada Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA Negeri 2 Baubau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35326/penalogik.v4i1.7467Keywords:
Sekolah Menengah Atas, Literatur Primer, Pendidikan BiologiAbstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji pemanfaatan literatur primer dalam meningkatkan pendidikan biologi di SMA Negeri 2 Baubau, Indonesia. Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi jenis-jenis literatur primer yang dapat diintegrasikan ke dalam kurikulum biologi, mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang mendukung dan menghambat implementasinya, serta mengusulkan strategi untuk meningkatkan integrasinya. Melalui pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif, data dikumpulkan dari guru biologi dan 100 siswa menggunakan wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi, survei, dan analisis dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa literatur primer, termasuk artikel penelitian, makalah konferensi, dan tesis akademik, belum secara sistematis diintegrasikan ke dalam proses pembelajaran. Namun, guru memiliki pemahaman dasar tentang literatur primer dan menyadari potensi manfaatnya untuk memperkaya pengalaman belajar siswa. Faktor-faktor pendukung integrasi meliputi dukungan administratif, antusiasme guru, dan rasa ingin tahu siswa, sementara tantangan meliputi akses terbatas ke sumber primer dan variasi keahlian guru. Studi ini mengusulkan strategi integrasi komprehensif yang melibatkan pemilihan literatur yang dapat diakses dan sesuai, kerja sama dengan lembaga pendidikan tinggi, dan desain pembelajaran terstruktur untuk memfasilitasi keterlibatan aktif siswa. Studi ini memberikan wawasan bagi berbagai pihakyang berupaya menghadirkan sumber belajar berbasis primer bagi siswa.
Downloads
References
Amarullah, A. K. (2023). Kajian Literatur dalam Menyusun Referensi Kunci, State of The Art, dan Keterbaharuan Penelitian (Novelty). Aktualita Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 13(1).
Andraos-Selim, C., Modzelewski, R. A., & Steinman, R. A. (2010). Inter-institutional Development of a Poster-Based Cancer Biology Learning Tool. Journal of Cancer Education, 25(3), 413–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0065-2
Ben-Assuli, O., & Jacobi, A. (2014). Distortion in Social Networks: Comparison of Various Types of Networks. 2014 International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloud.2014.17
Brill, G., Falk, H., & Yarden, A. (2004). The learning processes of two high‐school biology students when reading primary literature. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119465
Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005
DebBurman, S. K. (2002). Learning How Scientists Work: Experiential Research Projects to Promote Cell Biology Learning and Scientific Process Skills. Cell Biology Education, 1(4), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.02-07-0024
Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students’ academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12350
Fang, Z., Lamme, L., Pringle, R., Patrick, J., Sanders, J., Zmach, C., Charbonnet, S., & Henkel, M. (2008). Integrating Reading into Middle School Science: What we did, found and learned. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 2067–2089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701644266
Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving Middle School Students’ Science Literacy Through Reading Infusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383051
Fankhauser, S. C., & Lijek, R. S. (2016). Incorporating Primary Scientific Literature in Middle and High School Education. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1004
Gallo, M., & Rinaldo, V. (2012). Towards a Mastery Understanding of Critical Reading in Biology: The Use of Highlighting by Students to Assess Their Value Judgment of the Importance of Primary Literature. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 13(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v13i2.493
Garcia, P., Lueck, J., & Yakel, E. (2019). The Pedagogical Promise of Primary Sources: Research Trends, Persistent Gaps, and New Directions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.01.004
Gillen, C. M., Vaughan, J., & Lye, B. R. (2004). An online tutorial for helping nonscience majors read primary research literature in biology. Advances in Physiology Education, 28(3), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00044.2003
Hoskins, S. G., & Gottesman, A. J. (2018). Investigating Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Science in Courses Taught Using the CREATE Strategy. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1440
Hoskins, S. G., Lopatto, D., & Stevens, L. M. (2011). The C.R.E.A.T.E. Approach to Primary Literature Shifts Undergraduates’ Self-Assessed Ability to Read and Analyze Journal Articles, Attitudes about Science, and Epistemological Beliefs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027
Hoskins, S. G., Stevens, L. M., & Nehm, R. H. (2007). Selective Use of the Primary Literature Transforms the Classroom Into a Virtual Laboratory. Genetics, 176(3), 1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.071183
Howard, K. N., Stapleton, E. K., Nelms, A. A., Ryan, K. C., & Segura-Totten, M. (2021). Insights on biology student motivations and challenges when reading and analyzing primary literature. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0251275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251275
Jannana, N. S., Prabowo, T. T., & Istriyani, R. I. (2021). Identifying Fake News: A Lesson from Library Science Students. Khizanah Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 9(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.24252/v9i1a5
Kararo, M., & McCartney, M. (2019). Annotated primary scientific literature: A pedagogical tool for undergraduate courses. PLOS Biology, 17(1), e3000103. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000103
Kelly-Laubscher, R. F., & Luckett, K. (2016). Differences in Curriculum Structure between High School and University Biology: The Implications for Epistemological Access. Journal of Biological Education, 50(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1138991
Lammers, A., Goedhart, M. J., & Avraamidou, L. (2019). Reading and synthesising science texts using a scientific argumentation model by undergraduate biology students. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2323–2346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1675197
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Murray, T. A. (2014). Teaching students to read the primary literature using pogil activities. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20765
Önel, A., & Durdukoca, Ş. F. (2021). Research on The Effects of Reading Habits on The Academic Achievement of High School Students in Biology Course. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i9.3895
Pelaez, N., Anderson, T. R., Gardner, S. M., Yin, Y., Abraham, J. K., Bartlett, E. L., Gormally, C., Hurney, C. A., Long, T. M., Newman, D. L., Sirum, K., & Stevens, M. T. (2018). A Community-Building Framework for Collaborative Research Coordination across the Education and Biology Research Disciplines. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2), es2. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0060
Putri, E. I., Fitri, R., & Darussyamsu, R. (2022). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Ruang-Ruang Kelas: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 2(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24036/rrkjurnal.v2i3.116
Sato, B. K., Kadandale, P., He, W., Murata, P. M. N., Latif, Y., & Warschauer, M. (2014). Practice makes pretty good: Assessment of primary literature reading abilities across multiple large-enrollment biology laboratory courses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-02-0025
Taharu, F. I., Samritin, S., Nurwahida, N., Kusrini, K., & Laeto, A. Bin. (2020). Analisis Penerapan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Pada Pembelajaran Biologi di SMAN 2 Baubau. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 6(2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v6i2.692
van Lacum, E. B. (2013). Reading primary literature: Introducing undergraduate life science students to the rhetorical structure of research articles. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Woodin, T., Smith, D., & Allen, D. (2009). Transforming Undergraduate Biology Education for All Students: An Action Plan for the Twenty-First Century. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(4), 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-09-0063
Yarden, A. (2009). Reading Scientific Texts: Adapting Primary Literature for Promoting Scientific Literacy. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9124-2
Yarden, A., Brill, G., & Falk, H. (2001). Primary literature as a basis for a high-school biology curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2001.9655776
