Implementation of The Prosecutor's Intelligence Authority in Investigations of Corruption Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v8i2.5565Keywords:
Prosecutor's Intelligence, Corruption Crimes, InvestigationsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Prosecutorial Intelligence's authority in investigating alleged corruption at the Tidore Kepulauan District Attorney's Office and to identify the challenges encountered during the investigation process. The methodology employed is empirical legal research with a qualitative field approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and documentation studies. The research findings indicate that the implementation of the Prosecutorial Intelligence's authority at the Tidore Kepulauan District Attorney's Office aligns with the applicable regulations, including Article 30B paragraph (d) of Law No. 11 of 2021 on the Amendment of Law No. 16 of 2004 on the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia and Presidential Regulation No. 38 of 2010 on the Organization and Working Procedures of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Nonetheless, several significant challenges were identified in the investigation process, including budget constraints, insufficient education and training for staff, and inadequate facilities and infrastructure. This study provides recommendations to address these challenges, including increasing budget allocations, conducting regular training for Prosecutorial Intelligence staff, and providing adequate supporting facilities to enhance the effectiveness of corruption investigations.
Downloads
References
Anmuni, S. (2023). Implementasi wewenang intelejen kejaksaan dalam mengungkap dugaan tindak pidana korupsi di kabupaten timor tengah utara. Comserva Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(02), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i02.786
Cahyani, E. (2022). Pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (Ijclc), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v3i2.15527
Christianata, C. (2020). Pengenyampingan perkara tindak pidana korupsi oleh kejaksaan negeri palangka raya terhadap kasus kerugian uang negara dibawah rp. 50.000.000,-. Dih Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v16i2.3352
Dewi, P. (2023). Analisis penanganan perkara hukum pada tindak pidana terorisme menurut hukum positif di indonesia. Justicia Journal, 12(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.32492/jj.v12i1.12105
Fiaturrahman, M. (2023). Penuntutan tindak pidana kepabeanan pada daerah perbatasan negara kesatuan republik indonesia (nkri) dengan republik demokratic timor leste (rdtl) (studi di kejaksaan negeri belu ntt). Indonesia Berdaya, 4(2), 581-588. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2023460
Habibi, M. (2020). Independensi kewenangan komisi pemberantasan korupsi pasca perubahan undang-undang komisi pemberantasan korupsi. Cepalo, 4(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1962
Purnomo, M. and Soponyono, E. (2015). Rekonseptualisasi penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi oleh polri dalam rangka efektifitas pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Law Reform, 11(2), 230. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i2.15771
Salsabila, S. and Wahyudi, S. (2022). Peran kejaksaan dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi menggunakan pendekatan restorative justice. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.1.2022.61-70
Sandi, F. (2024). Penanganan tindak pidana korupsi dana desa dengan kerugian negara di bawah lima puluh juta rupiah oleh kejaksaan negeri kota sawahlunto. Legal, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.60034/c7ch2268
Sekarsari, D., Sugiartha, I., & Widyantara, I. (2022). Wewenang kepolisian dalam melakukan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(3), 578-584. https://doi.org/10.55637/jph.3.3.5581.578-584
Shahab, A. and Amiruddin, M. (2022). Peran intelijen kejaksaan dalam mengungkap tindak pidana korupsi di kota palopo. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 4(3), 583-591. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v4i3.19213
Siswandi, S., Sampara, S., & Badaru, B. (2020). Efektivitas kejaksaan dalam pengembalian kerugian negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi. Journal of Lex Theory (Jlt), 1(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlt.v1i2.263
Sosiawan, U. (2019). Peran komisi pemberantasan korupsi (kpk) dalam pencegahan dan pemberantasan korupsi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(4), 517. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.517-538
Ubleeuw, A. (2022). Komparasi pendekatan restorative justice dalam penanganan perkara pidana antara kepolisian dan kejaksaan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 10(2), 291. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v10i2.64717
Lytvyn, N., Artemenko, O., Kovalova, S., Kobets, M., & Kashtan, E. (2021). Administrative and legal mechanisms for combating corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(1), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-11-2021-0241
Ulhaq, A. (2023). Kedudukan penyidik kepolisian terhadap kewenangannya menangani perkara tindak pidana korupsi penyalahgunaan wewenang menurut perspektif sistem peradilan pidana. Al-Manhaj Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1205-1214. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2910
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurjanah Tuanaya, Faissal Malik, Amriyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Author retains the copyright and grants Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
