Future Implementation of Ius Constituendum and Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v7i1.2864Keywords:
Criminal Justice System, Future Regulation, Restorative JusticeAbstract
The notion of restorative justice is presently implemented in the Indonesian criminal justice system through Law No. 11 of 2012, which oversees the juvenile court system. Future expansion of the application of restorative justice within the criminal justice system is a topic of discussion. As a research methodology, legal norm research is employed. Deductive reasoning is used to reach conclusions. On the basis of research findings, the Government and the DPR are expected to swiftly formulate guidelines for the implementation of the concept of restorative justice issued by the Criminal Justice Subsystem in laws and regulations, both in the form of laws and in the Draft Code of Criminal Procedure (RKUHAP) and the Draft Law – Criminal Law (RKUHP). The implementation or application of the concept of restorative justice in the resolution of criminal cases involving these offenders shall be governed by these rules.
Downloads
References
Arianto, H. (2010). Hukum Responsif dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 7(2).
Fianhar. (n.d.). Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 Tentang Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Retrieved from https://www.fianhar.com/2018/09/penerapan-keadilan-restoratif-perkara-pidana.html.
Hamzah, A. (n.d.). Draft Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana ( Kuhp ), n.d.
Kenedi, J. (2017). Kebijakan Kriminal (Criminal Policy) dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia: Upaya Mensejahterakan Masyarakat (Social Welfare). Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam: Al-Imarah, 2.
Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15. (2020). Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif, n.d. pasal 3.
Putuhena, M. I. F. (2013). Politik Hukum Perundang-Undangan: Mempertegas Reformasi Legislasi yang Progresif. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2(3), 375–395.
Rahardjo, S. (2003). Sisi-Sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Salam, S. (2019). Rekonstruksi Paradigma Filsafat Ilmu: Studi Kritis Terhadap Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Ilmu. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 18(2), 885–896.
Siregar, B. (2020). Nilai Kebenaran dalam Keterangan Saksi ‘Meringankan’ Menjadi Saksi Memberatkan (Analisa Perkara Pidana Nomor: 696/Pid. B/2015/Pn. Plg). Lex LATA 1, 1(3).
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (1st ed.). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tambir, I. M. (2019). Pendekatan Restorative Justice salam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana di Tingkat Penyidikan. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 8(4), 549–574.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Author retains the copyright and grants Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
