Main Article Content

Abstract

Education inequality remains a major challenge in many disadvantaged and archipelagic regions of Indonesia, including Buru Regency. Limited access to formal schooling, socio-economic constraints, and inadequate infrastructure have encouraged the emergence of alternative education initiatives, one of which is Sekolah Rakyat. This study aims to examine community perspectives on Sekolah Rakyat and to assess the readiness of supporting infrastructure for its implementation in Buru Regency. The research employed a qualitative approach using a phenomenological method. Data were collected through open-ended interviews, direct observations, and documentation involving community leaders, educators, parents, local government officials, and representatives of the Education Office. Data analysis was conducted using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, encompassing data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the community generally holds positive perceptions of Sekolah Rakyat as an inclusive and flexible alternative education model that addresses the needs of children from low-income families and those with limited access to formal education. Key supporting factors include affordability, cultural proximity, and strong community engagement. However, several challenges were also identified, particularly related to legal recognition, program sustainability, teacher competence, and infrastructure adequacy. The study also reveals that infrastructure readiness has shown positive progress, supported by land allocation, temporary facilities, and strong cross-sectoral coordination. In conclusion, Sekolah Rakyat has significant potential to promote educational equity in Buru Regency, provided that institutional support, policy integration, and sustainable infrastructure development are strengthened.

Keywords

Sekolah Rakyat community-based education educational equity infrastructure readiness

Article Details

How to Cite
Badu, T. K., & Mukadar, S. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities of Community Schools in Buru Regency. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 11(4), 1288–1300. https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v11i4.7700

References

  1. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
  2. Arsad, A., & Yusnan, M. (2023). Improving Student Learning Outcomes Through Problem Based Learning Models in Indonesian Language Subjects for Elementary School Students. AIQU: Journal Multidiscipliner of Science, 1(2), 74-83.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Kabupaten Buru dalam angka 2023. BPS Kabupaten Buru.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  5. Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Rencana strategis Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi 2020–2024. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.
  6. Koentjaraningrat. (2015). Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  7. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  8. Prasetyo, B., & Widodo, T. (2020). Community-based schools and learning motivation of children from low-income families in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 75, 102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102180
  9. Rogers, A. (2014). The base of the iceberg: Informal learning and its impact on formal and non-formal learning. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
  10. Rogers, A., & Street, B. V. (2012). Adult literacy and development: Stories from the field. Comparative Education, 48(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.637766
  11. Rose, P. (2019). Can education systems be equitable by 2030? Evidence from global education research. Oxford: University of Oxford, REAL Centre.
  12. Sen, A. (2010). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. Suharto, E. (2018). Kebijakan sosial sebagai kebijakan publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  14. Suryadi, A. (2019). Pendidikan, ketimpangan sosial, dan pembangunan daerah tertinggal. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  15. Tilaar, H. A. R. (2018). Kebijakan pendidikan: Pengantar untuk memahami kebijakan pendidikan dan kebudayaan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  16. Tilaar, H. A. R. (2018). Pendidikan, kebudayaan, dan masyarakat madani Indonesia. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  17. Tilaar, H. A. R. (2019). Pendidikan, kebudayaan, dan masyarakat madani Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  18. UNDP. (2020). Human development report 2020: The next frontier—Human development and the Anthropocene. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
  19. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
  20. United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development report 2020: The next frontier—Human development and the Anthropocene. New York: UNDP.
  21. World Bank. (2020). Indonesia education and skills: Learning for all. World Bank Group.
  22. World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. Washington, DC: World Bank.