Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 13, 2022
Accepted
May 31, 2022
Published
May 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 959 Download : 565

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The goal of this study is to examine the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) after its coming into effect in Indonesia using a defense diplomacy strategy. The research approach used in this study is descriptive analytic qualitative research. The data gathering approaches employed in this study were interviews and literature reviews. According to the findings of this study, every country has the right to access and develop weapons as well as to protect itself. Indonesia, on the other hand, is outside the ATT system since it has chosen to abstain. According to Article 5 of the ATT, Indonesia is not required to report on the feasibility assessment of the transfer of conventional weapons. Indonesia, on the other hand, can improve the conventional weapons regime and the UNPoA to prevent weapons from being circulated in conflict-prone areas.

Keywords

Arms Trade Treaty Defense Diplomacy Strategy Entry Into Force

Article Details

License
Sang Pencerah Journal is an electronic journal that freely available. Papers that submitted to this journal are published under the terms of the Creative Commons License. The terms of the license are:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 Creative Commons License
How to Cite
Pedrason, R. (2022). Indonesian Defense Diplomacy Strategy in Post the ATT Enforcement. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 8(2), 592–600. https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v8i2.2255
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alley, R. (2019). Small arms and light weapons: the disjunction problem. Conflict, Security and Development, 19(2), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1570722
  2. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  3. Charles, E. (2015). Strengthening humanitarian law: Commonwealth countries and the Arms Trade Treaty. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 41(2), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2015.1067629
  4. Chotimah, H. C., Iswardhana, M. R., & Pratiwi, T. S. (2019). Penerapan Military Confi dence Building Measures dalam Menjaga Ketahanan Nasional Indonesia di Ruang Siber. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 25(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.50344
  5. Creswell, J. (2017). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth). Sage Publication.
  6. Dahari, R., Idris, N. A., & Othman, Z. (2019). Influencing External Factors for Small Arms Light Weapon Smuggling at Malaysia-Thailand Border. Asian Social Science, 15(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v15n3p14
  7. Fachriana, V. F. (2021). Analisa Kebijakan Inggris meningkatkan Kerjasama Penjualan Senjata dengan Arab Saudi terkait Konflik Yaman Tahun 2015-2017. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
  8. Gumay, R. N. S., Octavian, A., & Swastanto, Y. (2018). Defense Diplomacy Implementation: the Synergy of Indonesia and Australia in Dealing With Illegal Immigrants in the Sea Border. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 8(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v8i1.278
  9. Jonesti, P. (2016). Kebijakan Indonesia Abstain dalam Arms Trade Treaty Tahun 2013. JOM FISIP, 3(2), 1–23.
  10. Kalinina, N., & Kozyulin, V. (2010). the Arms Trade Treaty: Making the Guns Fall Silent. Security Index: A Russian Journal on International Security, 16(4), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/19934270.2010.535142
  11. Lele, G. (2021). Asymmetric decentralization, accommodation and separatist conflict: lessons from Aceh and Papua, Indonesia. Territory, Politics, Governance, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.1875036
  12. Maletta, G. (2021). Seeking a Responsible Arms Trade to Reduce Human Suffering in Yemen. International Spectator, 56(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2021.1876862
  13. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (Second). SAGE Publication.
  14. Nave, E. (2019). The Importance of the Arms Trade Treaty for the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 24(2), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krz010
  15. Okoli, A. C. (2021). Military, Arms Monopoly and Proliferation of Small Arms and Light Weapons in Africa. In U. A. Tar & C. P. Onwurah (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Small Arms and Conflicts in Africa (pp. 429–451). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62183-4_21
  16. Putranto, F. T. (2015). Diplomasi Bilateral Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbatasan Indonesia-Malaysia. Transformasi, 1(28), 1–88.
  17. Rhasintya, M. (2020). Analisis Snyder Dalam Keputusan Abstain Indonesia Dalam Sidang Majelis Umum PBB Tahun 2013 Mengenai Perjanjian Perdagangan Senjata. Journal of Government Science, 1(2), 109–117.
  18. Saramifar, Y. (2018). Enchanted by the AK-47: Contingency of body and the weapon among Hezbollah militants. Journal of Material Culture, 23(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183517725099
  19. Sazqya. (2022). Peran PBB Dalam Melaksanakan Pengawasan Terhadap Perdagangan Senjata Internasional Menurut Perjanjian Perdagangan Senjata. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum, 2(4), 1–9.
  20. SIPRI. (2022). International arms transfers. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://www.sipri.org/research/armament-and-disarmament/arms-and-military-expenditure/international-arms-transfers
  21. Stavrianakis, A. (2016). Legitimising liberal militarism: politics, law and war in the Arms Trade Treaty. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 840–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1113867
  22. Sudarsono, B. P., Mahroza, J., & D W, S. (2018). Indonesia Defense Diplomacy in Achieving National Interest. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 8(3), 69–88.
  23. UNHR. (2020). Impact of arms transfers on human rights: Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General. %0A%0AA/HRC/44/29 - Impact of the diversion of arms and ... - OHCHR%0Ahttps://www.ohchr.org › A_HRC_44_29_AEV%0A
  24. Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (2012). International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism. Pearson.
  25. Witarti, D. I. (2014). Diplomasi Indonesia Terhadap Perjanjian Perdagangan Senjata (Arms Trade Treaty) Pada Sidang Majelis Umum Pbb Tahun 2013. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 4(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v4i2.334