Main Article Content

Abstract

With the benefit of globalization and access to data, unceremonious populations came to use social platforms largely used by several ages. Nonetheless, natural problems have been triggering universal effects, just as concerns of social feebleness. Natural mindfulness mixings new application propensities, performing another socially skilled stance. This analysis plans to separate the influence of relational organizations on natural mindfulness and the social responsibility of several ages. We employ the structure of the quantitative and distinctive study, by approaching the Primary Condition Establishing. The results feature that people who are presented with data (recordings, photographs, messages) acknowledged with social commitment and natural supportability are impacted in the progress of social and ecological mindfulness. However, all ages familiarized the most marginal approaches for responses in the quest for data on natural and social issues. This is appropriate to society, presentation organizations, government offices, and organizations to advance deeds and data on social and ecological obligation and connect all Ages in maintainable development.

Keywords

Climate Change Bangladesh Environmental awareness and sustainability

Article Details

How to Cite
Pasha, A. K., Jabin, M. M., Mozumder, S., & Parveen, M. (2021). The Role of Social Networks on building Awareness and social responsibility to achieve Environmental Sustainability in Bangladesh. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 7(4), 552–564. https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v7i4.1541

References

  1. Ahiduzzaman, M., & Islam, A. K. M. S. (2011). Greenhouse gas emission and renewable energy sources for sustainable development in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4659–4666.
  2. Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices.
  3. Iandoli, L., Klein, M., & Zollo, G. (2009). Enabling on-line deliberation and collective decision-making through large-scale argumentation: a new approach to the design of an Internet-based mass collaboration platform. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), 1(1), 69–92.
  4. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
  5. Kent, M. L., Taylor, M., & White, W. J. (2003). The relationship between Web site design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Public Relations Review, 29(1), 63–77.
  6. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.
  7. Knight, G. (2018). Data Management for interview and focus group resources in health.
  8. Paavola, J. (2001). Towards sustainable consumption: economics and ethical concerns for the environment in consumer choices. Review of Social Economy, 59(2), 227–248.
  9. Pasha, A. B. M. K., Chowdhury, A. H., Hussain, A., Rahman, M., Mozumder, S., & Fuente, J. A. Dela. (n.d.). Identification of the ecosystem services and plant diversity in Ramna Park Dhaka.
  10. Pasha, A. B. M. K., Mozumder, S., & Chakma, K. (n.d.). The impact of Jhum cultivation on hilly area (Rangamati, Khagrachari).
  11. Rahim, M., & Jalaladeen, J. (2016). The role of social media on environmental awareness of undergraduate students in University of Sulaimani in Iraq. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences–JALHSS, 10, 218–231.
  12. Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: an empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
  13. Roberts, J. A., & Bacon, D. R. (1997). Exploring the subtle relationships between environmental concern and ecologically conscious consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 79–89.
  14. Severo, E. A., Guimarães, J. C. F. de, Dellarmelin, M. L., & Ribeiro, R. P. (2019). The influence of social networks on environmental awareness and the social responsibility of generations. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 16, 500–518.
  15. SPSS, I. N. C. (2007). SPSS® 16.0 for Windows, Release 16.0. 0, Copyright© By SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois.
  16. Taylor, M., Kent, M. L., & White, W. J. (2001). How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27(3), 263–284.
  17. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.
  18. Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1994). Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
  19. Wood, G. D. (1994). Bangladesh: whose ideas, whose interests? Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP).