Restorative Justice Policy Model in the Future of Criminal Law

Authors

  • Rado Rudini Hasyim Universitas Musamus
  • Restu Monika Nia Betaubun Faculty Law, Social and Political Sciences, Terbuka University
  • Emiliana B. Rahail Faculty of Law, Musamus University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v9i1.5124

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Policy Model, Criminal Justice System

Abstract

Restorative justice as a constructive, creative, self-determined action with assistance and open opportunities for group involvement. Peaceful resolution of criminal cases using this mechanism has even been a local wisdom in various regions and customary laws in Indonesia which aims to resolve conflicts, restore balance and bring a sense of peace. As a cultural manifestation, the restorative justice approach should also be realised in practice through the criminal justice system, which has so far seemed rigid. This research focuses on the restorative justice policy model in the future of criminal law. This research is classified as qualitative research with empirical juridical and normative juridical methods oriented to the statutory approach and conceptual approach. This research concludes that restorative justice is a necessity because in addition to international challenges and obligations, it has also become a national trend in the future of criminal law, especially through the New Criminal Code which contains mechanisms for restoring victims’ rights, penal mediation, diversion, supervision punishment and judicial pardon. These mechanisms can operate in various models of informal mediation, traditional village or tribal moots, victim-offender mediation, and reparation negotiation programmes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afuan, R. D. (2021). Penerapan Diversi Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).

Arief, B. N. (2008). Mediasi Penal: Penyelesaian Perkara di Luar Pengadilan. Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana, Undip.

Arief, B. N. (2012). Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional (Indonesia). Penerbit Pustaka Magister.

Badilla, N. W. Y., Rado, R. H., Pieter, S., & Rauf, M. A. A. (2022). Implementasi Mediasi Penal sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara di Kepolisian Resort Merauke. HERMENEUTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1).

Budoyo, S., & Sari, R. K. (2019). Eksistensi Restorative Justice sebagai Tujuan Pelaksanaan Diversi pada Sistem Peradilan Anak di Indonesia. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 2(2).

Hengki, I. G. B. (2018). Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Luar Pengadilan (Nonlitigasi) di Indonesia. Jurnal Advokasi, 8(2).

Juita, S. R., Kridasaksana, D., & Triwati, A. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Pada Korban Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Mediasi Penal Dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. Humani (Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani), 7(1), 52–62.

Krismiyarsi, K. (2020). Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Jalan Raya. SPEKTRUM HUKUM, 17(2).

Lesmana, C. S. A. T. (2019). Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1), 1–23.

Mulyadi, L. (2013). Mediasi Penal dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Pengkajian Aasa, Norma, Teori, dan Praktik. Yustisia, Vol 85 (2013). http://jurnal.hukum.uns.ac.id/index.php/Yustisia/article/view/324

Nasional, B. P. H., Manusia, H. A., & Indonesia, R. (2015). Draft Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.

Novian, R., Eddyono, S. W., Kamilah, A. G., Dirga, S., Nathania, C., Napitupulu, E. A. T., Wiryawan, S. M., & Budhiman, A. A. (2018). Strategi Menangani Overcrowding di Indonesia: Penyebab, Dampak dan Penyelesaiannya. Diedit oleh Zainal; Anggara Abidin. Pertama. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR), 4–12.

Prayoga, I. W. D., & Setiabudi, I. K. R. (2021). Relevansi Mediasi Penal di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 10(4), 841–856.

Putra, R. (2009). Ide Keseimbangan Dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Rado, R. H., Arief, B. N., & Soponyono, E. (2016). Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Terhadap Penyelesaian Konflik Sara Di Kepulauan Kei Dalam Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Law Reform, 12(2), 266–276.

Rado, R. H., & Badillah, N. (2019). Konsep Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 3(2), 149–163.

Sartika, D., Pancaningrum, R. K., & Jumadi, J. (2022). Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Peran Bhabinkamtibmas dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana dengan Mekanisme Restorative Justice di Gunung Sari Lombok Barat. Prosiding Semnaskom-Unram, 4(1), 256–271.

Soponyono, E. (2012). Kebijakan Formulasi Sistem Pemidanaan Yang Berorientasi Pada Korban Dalam Bidang Hukum Pidana Materiil. POHON CAHAYA.

Sudirdja, R. P. (2019). Penguatan Kewenangan Penuntut Umum Melalui Pengesampingan Perkara Pidana Dengan Alasan Tertentu. JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal), 20(2).

Syakir, Y., & Sujarwo, H. (2023). Kebijakan Pemaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) dalam KUHP Baru. Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum, 9(1), 109–118.

Yudi Krismen, U. S., & SH, M. H. (2022). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-03-06

Accepted

2025-01-31

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Rudini Hasyim, R., Nia Betaubun, R. M., & B. Rahail, E. (2024). Restorative Justice Policy Model in the Future of Criminal Law. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 9(1), 29–27. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v9i1.5124

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): DECEMBER

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Rado Rudini Hasyim, Restu Monika Nia Betaubun, Emiliana B. Rahail

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

An author who publishes in  Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.