Law Enforcement Against Disseminers Of Dishonour Content On Social Media

Case study the distribution of recordings of caning processions in Aceh

Authors

  • Friska Anggi Siregar Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa
  • Sari Yulis Al-Banna Lhokseumawe College of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v8i2.4595

Keywords:

Caning, ITE Law, Spreading Dishonour

Abstract

Responding to the phenomenon of defamation during the execution of caning sentences, the Aceh Government limited the place where caning sentences were carried out from initially being carried out in public places and then being transferred to detention centres or correctional institutions. This rule is stated in Governor's Regulation Number 5 of 2018. The aim of moving the place of execution to a detention centre is to protect the rights of the convict so that it does not spread on social media. With the issuance of Gubernatorial Regulation no. 5 of 2018, of course there are legal implications regarding whether or not to record the caning procession. If caning is considered a disgrace, then those who spread caning can be charged under the ITE Law on defamation, but this phenomenon continues to occur and there are no calls from law enforcers to prohibit it. Thus, researchers feel it is necessary to examine the legal certainty regarding the dissemination of recordings of caning processions on digital media, and what the view of Islamic law is regarding the dissemination of recordings of caning processions on digital media. This research is entirely qualitative research (qualitative approach) using a normative juridical approach or library research. From the results of the research, it was concluded that there is no clear prohibition on the distribution of caning punishments either in the governor's regulation or in the qanun, so the law is permissible. The perpetrator also cannot be charged under the ITE Law because the execution is open to the public. However, victims may report to the authorities if they feel that the news conveyed does not match the facts or attacks their honour. This is also not prohibited in Islam, because it is classified as permissible backbiting, with the aim of making the perpetrators feel embarrassed and have a deterrent effect and warning for others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Qadir Audah. (2009). At-Tasyri’ Al-Jana’I Al-Islami Muqaranan Bi Al-Qanun Al-Wadhi. Kairo: Al-Maktabah At-Taufiqiyah.

Abu Ihsan al-Atsari. (2005). Ensiklopedi Larangan Menurut Al-Qur’an dan as-Sunnah . Jakarta: Pustaka Imam As-Syafi’i.

Al-Hilali. (2005). Syarah Riadhus Shalihin. Jakarta: Pustaka Imam As-Syafi’i.

Asdiana. (2020). Nilai Pendidikan Dalam Pelaksanaan Hukuman Cambuk Di Aceh Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan & Pembelajaran (Vol. 7). Takengon: IAIN Takengon

bbc indonesia. (2018). Alasan investasi, hukuman cambuk di Aceh dipindah ke dalam LP. Dikutip dari https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-43739493

Dahlan Surbakti. (2015). Peran dan fungsi pers menurut undang-undang pers tahun 1999 serta perkembangannya. Dikutip dari https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/81875/peran-dan-fungsi-pers-menurut-undang-undang-pers-tahun-1999-serta-perkembangannya

Departemen Agama RI. (2000). Syaamil Al-Qur’an dan Terjemah. Bandung: Syamil Qur’an.

Hukum Online. (2005). Ancaman Pencemaran Nama Baik Mengintai. Dikutip dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ancaman-pencemaran-nama-baik-mengintai-hol12901/

Imam Suprayogo dan Tabrani. (2003). Metodelogi Penelitian Sosial Agama. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Iqbal, M., & Kabir, A. (2020). Perkembangan Pelaksanaan Hukuman Cambuk Di Aceh (Vol. 9). Banda Aceh: UIN Ar-Raniry

KUHP. (2023). UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. Dikutip dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/234935/uu-no-1-tahun-2023

Makhrus Munajat. (2009). Hukum Pidana Islam di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Teras.

Margo Hadi Putra. (2018). Efektifitas penerapan prinsip asas praduga tidak bersalah atas penggiringan opini yang dilakukan perusahaan pers berdasarkan pasal 5 ayat (1) undang-undang nomor 40 tahun 1999 tentang pers. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 3(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v3i1.2707. Karawang: Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Moeljatno. (2000). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Mulyono. (2019). Implementasi Wisata Syari’ah Lombok dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syari’ah. Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam. DOI:10.29240/jhi.v4i2.1002. Bengkulu: IAIN Curup

Muslim. (2004). Shahih Muslim . Beirut: Dar-al Kitab ‘Araby.

Musthofa Sa’id Al Khin. (1987). Nuzhatul Muttaqin Syarah Riyadhus Shalihin . Beirut: Mu’assisah Ar-Risalah.

Pergub Aceh. (2018). Peraturan gubernur aceh no 5 tahun 2018, tentang hukum acara jinayat. Dikutip dari https://jdihn.go.id/search/daerah/detail/590357

Rochman. (2021). Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial: Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Positif Dan Islam.Diktum, Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum. Pare-Pare: IAIN Pare

Satino. (2021). Peran Pers Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, https://doi.org/10.35586/esensihukum.v3i1.57

Shah Rangga. (2015). Tinjauan yuridis mengenai sanksi pidana terhadap tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial. Jurnal Harian Regional. Dikutip dari https://jurnal.harianregional.com/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/14308

Soejono Soekanto dan Sri Mamuji. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normative. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sri Rahayu. (2014). Implikasi Asas Legalitas Terhadap Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Jambi: Universitas Negeri Jambi

Taryadi. (2020). Efektifitas pelaksanaan eksekusi hukuman cambuk terhadap pelaku jinayat di kabupaten aceh tamiang dalam perspektif qanun hukum acara jinayah, 15(2). Jurnal Hukum Samudera Keadilan, Langsa: Universitas Negeri Langsa

UU Pers. (1999). Undang Undang Republik Indonesia. Dikutip dari https://dewanpers.or.id

Downloads

Submitted

2023-10-20

Accepted

2023-12-23

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Siregar, F. A., & Yulis, S. (2024). Law Enforcement Against Disseminers Of Dishonour Content On Social Media: Case study the distribution of recordings of caning processions in Aceh. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 8(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v8i2.4595

Issue

Section

Articles