Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 4, 2024
Accepted
May 20, 2024
Published
May 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 162 Download : 66

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The rise of fraudulent methods seems to be a big task for state officials in Indonesia. Housewives are the primary victims of phishing crimes. The absence of knowledge and information about legal literacy in relation to phishing crimes via WhatsApp and Telegram messages appears to be a significant obstacle. This study aims to understand the role of housewives in Surabaya, particularly in dealing with phishing, and educate their family and friends about legal literacy to prevent them from becoming victims of these criminal acts. We use a descriptive method that employs a quantitative approach. The data used is primary data. The data collection technique entails distributing data via a Google Form questionnaire and utilizing information from previous literature, journals, online media, and books. The research results showed that messages sent via WhatsApp or cellphones, which contained invitations to join or clicked on unclear links, had the greatest impact on the group of elderly housewives. This is due to a lack of information regarding fraud prevention awareness. Housewives are required to be socialized about phishing crimes and legal literacy. Legal literacy among housewives in the city of Surabaya is very necessary, considering that there are many cases of violations committed by housewives, some of which even have criminal consequences. Educating housewives on the fundamentals of fair legal literacy can help lower the high crime rate that stems from a lack of legal understanding. The elderly group, especially housewives in Surabaya, still lacks experience dealing with personal problems based on their comfort.

Keywords

crime Housewives Legal Literacy Phishing

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Chusnur Ismiati, Muhammad Syahrul Borman, Guruh Marhaenis Handoko Putro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Sang Pencerah Journal is an electronic journal that freely available. Papers that submitted to this journal are published under the terms of the Creative Commons License. The terms of the license are:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 Creative Commons License
How to Cite
Ismiati, C., Borman, M. S., & Handoko Putro, G. M. (2024). Legal Literacy: The Role of Housewives in Overcoming Phising Criminal. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 10(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v10i2.5075
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amanda, Gita. 2023. ‘Maraknya Kejahatan Phishing Melalui Aplikasi Whatsapp: Waspadai Modus Penipuan’. News.Republika.co.id. Retrieved (https://news.republika.co.id/berita/rx3r9g423/maraknya-kejahatan-phishing-melalui-aplikasi-whatsapp-waspadai-modus-penipuan).
  2. Amin Muftiadi, Tri Putri Mulyani Agustina, and Margaretha Evi. 2022. ‘Studi Kasus Keamanan Jaringan Komputer: Analisis Ancaman Phising terhadap Layanan Online Banking’. Hexatech: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik 1(2):60–65.
  3. Ananda, Fiska. 2018. ‘Penerapan Diversi Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana’. Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1(1):77–86. doi: 10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2566.
  4. Bappenas. 2018. ‘Kelompok Usia’. Sepakat.Bappenas.go.id.
  5. Busyro, Marwan. 2019. ‘Tinjauan Kriminologis Terhadap Preman yang Melakukan Kejahatan (Studi Kasus Polsek Batangtoru)’. Doktrina: Journal of Law 2(2):99. doi: 10.31289/doktrina.v2i2.2614.
  6. Chang, Lennon Y. C., and Nicholas Coppel. 2020. ‘Building Cyber Security Awareness in a Developing Country: Lessons from Myanmar’. Computers and Security 97:101959. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101959.
  7. Cristiana, Marsena Yanis, Rai Yuliartini, and Sudika Mangku. 2019. ‘Peran Kepolisian Sebagai Penyidik dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga di Kabupaten Karangasem’. E-Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Ilmu Hukum 2(2):78–87.
  8. Cross, Cassandra. 2015. ‘No Laughing Matter: Blaming the Victim of Online Fraud’. International Review of Victimology 21(2):187–204. doi: 10.1177/0269758015571471.
  9. Dewantoro, Naufal Mahira, and Dian Alan Setiawan. 2023. ‘Penegakan Hukum Kejahatan Siber Berbasis Phising dalam Bentuk Application Package Kit (APK) Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik’. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies 3(2):892–900. doi: 10.29313/bcsls.v3i2.7247.
  10. Effendy, Rully Sutansyah. 2019. ‘Pengaruh Upah Minimum Terhadap Pengurangan Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka di Indonesia’. Fokus Ekonomi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi 14(1):115–24. doi: 10.34152/fe.14.1.115-124.
  11. Fanasafa, Irfan. 2022. ‘Waspada! Kehajatan Phising Mengintai Anda’. Djkn.Kemenkeu.go.id.
  12. Fanasafa, Irfan. 2023. ‘Mitigasi Risiko Komunikasi Digital di Kalangan Lanjut Usia’. Djkn.Kemenkeu.go.id.
  13. Fikri, Adi Wibowo Noor, Achmad Fauzi, Aldi Alfathur Rachman, Anggita Khaerunisa, Dhea Puspita Sari, Puput Vernanda, Raudhatul Hikmah, and Tiara Putri Fadyanti. 2023. ‘Analisis Keamanan Sistem Operasi dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Phishing dalam Layanan Online Banking’. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin 2(1):84–91.
  14. Frensh, Wenggedes, Syafruddin Kalo, Mahmud Mulyadi, and Chairul Bariah. 2017. ‘164999-ID-Kebijakan-Kriminal-Penanggulangan-Cyber(1)’. USU Law Journal 5(2):34–45.
  15. Ghoni, Mahendra Ridwanul, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. 2020. ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum Melalui Implementasi Diversi di Indonesia’. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2(3):331–42. doi: 10.14710/jphi.v2i3.331-342.
  16. Ginanjar, Aseh, Nur Widiyasono, and Rohmat Gunawan. 2019. ‘Web Phising Attack Analysis on E-Commerce Service Using Network Forensic Process Method’. Jurnal Terapan Teknologi Informasi 2(2):147–57. doi: 10.21460/jutei.2018.22.111.
  17. Heriani, Fitri Novia. 2023. ‘Modus Phishing Makin Canggih, Konsumen Diminta Jaga Data Pribadi’. Hukumonline.com.
  18. Imtiyaaz, Faqih. 2023. ‘Kasus Phising Makin Marak, BPKN RI Bahas Strategi Pencegahan Bareng Pemprov Sulsel’. Makassar.Tribunnews.com.
  19. Millah, Izza Aliyatul. 2020. ‘Penanggulangan Kejahatan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19’. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha 6(2):497–513.
  20. Muhammad, Faiz Emery, and Beniharmoni Harefa. 2023. ‘Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penipuan Phishing Berbasis Web’. Jurnal Usm Law Review 6(1):226. doi: 10.26623/julr.v6i1.6649.
  21. Mumpuni, Niken Wahyuning, and Silvia Diah Puspitaningrum. 2022. ‘Pencegahan Permasalahan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) di Dusun Sembur Desa Tirtomartani’. Empowerment: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 5(02):197–207. doi: 10.25134/empowerment.v5i02.5056.
  22. Naurah, Nada. 2023. ‘Serangan Phishing di Indonesia Terus Meningkat, Ini Datanya’. Goodstats.id.
  23. Nurhadi, Muhammad. 2022. ‘4 Cara Agar Nomor Rekening Tidak Kena Phishing, Waspada Kejahatan Digital’. Suara.com.
  24. Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. 2023. ‘Wali Kota Eri Imbau Warga Waspadai Penipuan Modus Telepon Kecelakaan’. Surabaya.go.id.
  25. Perdana, Nugraha, and Andi Hartik. 2023. ‘Tergiur Aplikasi Kerja Online, Ibu di Kota Malang Tertipu Rp 98 Juta’. Kompas.com.
  26. Purwanti, Yuli, Fathur Rachman, Tedi Gunawan, and Andriansyah Kartadinata. 2023. ‘Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan dengan Metode Phising oleh Kepolisian Daerah Lampung’. Audi Et AP: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 2(01):64–71. doi: 10.24967/jaeap.v2i01.2088.
  27. Rai Yuliartini, Ni Putu, and Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku. 2020. ‘Legal Protection for Women Victims of Trafficking in Indonesia in an International Human Rights Perspective’. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9:1397–1404. doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.160.
  28. Rosliana, Ridha. 2023. ‘Daerah Di Jawa Timur dengan Angka Kriminalitas Paling Tinggi’. News.Harianjogja.com.
  29. Ruhunlela, Marlisa, Marwan Mas, and Yulia A. Hasan. 2019. ‘Tangga Di Wilayah Hukum Polsek Mandai Polres Maros The Police In Managing Criminal Violence In Household In The Mandai Polsek Jurisdiction Of Maros Regency Police Resort’. 2(1):52–60.
  30. Sabon, Lauren Copley. 2018. ‘Force, Fraud, and Coercion—What Do They Mean? A Study of Victimization Experiences in a New Destination Latino Sex Trafficking Network’. Feminist Criminology 13(5):456–76. doi: 10.1177/1557085116676886.
  31. Saputra, Andi. 2023. ‘Gadaikan SK Ratusan Juta, PNS ini Malah Jadi Korban Phishing’. Detiknews.com.
  32. Sudanto, Anton. 2007. ‘Penerapan Hukum Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia’. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 7(1):138–61.
  33. Sugiarto, Totok. 2019. ‘Pengaruh Lingkungan, Media Massa dan Masyarakat Sebagai Penyebab Anak-Anak Melakukan Tindakan Kriminal’. Jurnal IUS 7(2).
  34. Wardani, Agustin Setyo. 2021. ‘Selain Email, Penjahat Siber Sering Kirimkan Phishing via whatsApp Dan Telegram’. Liputan6.com.
  35. Wibowo, Mia Haryati, and Nur Fatimah. 2017. ‘Ancaman Phishing terhadap Pengguna Sosial Media dalam Dunia Cyber Crime’. JOEICT (Jurnal of Education and Information Communication Technology) 1(1):1–5.
  36. Yasin, Ahmad Alamuddin. 2023. ‘Analisis Kebutuhan pada Literasi Hukum Bagi Siswa Sekolah Menengah’. YUDHISTIRA: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum Dan Peradilan 1(1):74–81. doi: 10.59966/yudhistira.v1i1.91.
  37. Yustitiana, Rhesita. 2021. ‘Pelaksanaan Pengaturan Hukum Tindak Kejahatan Fraud Phishing Transaksi Elektronik Sebagai Bagian dari Upaya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Teori Efektivitas Hukum’. Jurnal Hukum Visio Justisia 1(1):98–126.