Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 20, 2023
Accepted
February 3, 2024
Published
February 8, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 55 Download : 60

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Pergerakan berbasis kampus menjadi fenomena unik dengan kegiatan dampak bangkitan dan juga tarikan pada durasi waktu yang cukup panjang. Ketersediaan lahan parkir pada area kampus yang terbatas tidak sejalan dengan jumlah mahasiswa yang memiliki kendaraan pribadi. Upaya pemerintah dalam menyediakan angkutan umum perkotaan yang melayani seluruh pergerakan masyarakat masih belum optimal mengubah pola perjalanan dan moda pilihan. Jumlah kendaraan pribadi yang terus meningkat, juga makin maraknya angkutan umum berbasis aplikasi yang menawarkan berbagai kemudahan dan keunggulan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan identifikasi moda transportasi pilihan mahasiswa dengan metode Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) terhadap faktor: Kenyamanan, Kebersihan, Keamanan, Waktu, Keandalan, Biaya dan Aksesibilitas. Adapun alternatif moda transportasi yaitu: Kendaraan Pribadi, Angkutan Umum Perkotaan, Angkutan Online, dan Ojek Konvensional. Hasil Analisis Sensitivitas metode Analythical Hierarchy Process (AHP) menunjukkan bahwa perubahan preferensi terhadap faktor-faktor dominan yaitu Biaya (34,0%), Waktu (18,2%), dan Keselamatan (16,0%) tidak cukup mengubah moda transportasi utama yaitu Kendaraan Pribadi meski dengan pengurangan bobot 5% dan penambahan 5-10%.

Keywords

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Moda Transportasi Analytical Hierarchy Process

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Try Sugiyarto Soeparyanto, Statiswaty Statiswaty, Susilowati Susilowati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Sang Pencerah Journal is an electronic journal that freely available. Papers that submitted to this journal are published under the terms of the Creative Commons License. The terms of the license are:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 Creative Commons License
How to Cite
Soeparyanto, T. S., Statiswaty, S., & Susilowati, S. (2024). Analisis Sensitivitas Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Perjalanan Berbasis Kampus dengan Multi Criteria Decision Making. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 10(1), 158–172. Retrieved from http://jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Pencerah/article/view/4209
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Andrian, A., Anggraini, R., & Sugiarto, S. (2019). Analisis Karakteristik Responden Dan Atribut Perjalanan Terhadap Pemilihan Moda Angkutan Umum Rute Banda Aceh – Tapaktuan. Jurnal Arsip Rekayasa Sipil Dan Perencanaan, 2(4), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.24815/jarsp.v2i4.14946
  2. Anindityas, Y. F. L., Rizki, M., & Joewono, T. B. (2021). Effect of the Rise in Online Motorcycle Taxi Services on the Number of Motorcycles using the Interrupted Time Series Method. Civil Engineering Dimension, 23(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.23.2.123-130
  3. Arianto, N., & Asmalah, L. (2021). Upaya Meningkatkan Kepuasan Penumpang Ojek Online Melalui Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Tarif Yang Ditawarkan. KREATIF : Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Manajemen Universitas Pamulang, 9(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.32493/jk.v9i2.y2021.p101-111
  4. Asadabadi, M. R., Chang, E., & Saberi, M. (2019). Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). Cogent Engineering, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153
  5. Aziah, A., & Adawia, P. R. (2018). Analisis Perkembangan Industri Transportasi Online di Era Inovasi Disruptif (Studi Kasus PT Gojek Indonesia). Cakrawala, Jurnal Humaniora Bina Sarana Informatika, 18(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v3i2.107
  6. Badan Pusat Statistik Kendari. (2023). Kota Kendari dalam Angka 2023. 2331. https://kendarikota.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/07a75f2275f1c4aa06ccc9d1/kota-kendari-dalam-angka-2023.html
  7. Barcik, R., & Bylinko, L. (2018). Transportation demand management as a tool of transport policy. Transport Problems, 13(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2018.13.2.12
  8. Belay, S., Goedert, J., Woldesenbet, A., & Rokooei, S. (2022). AHP based multi criteria decision analysis of success factors to enhance decision making in infrastructure construction projects. Cogent Engineering, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2043996
  9. Budi, W., & Rofid, F. A. (2020). Evaluating the Performance of Transjakarta Bus Stops and Road Section Facilities on the Route Pondok Gede-Pulogadung. IJTI (International Journal of Transportation and Infrastructure), 3(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.29138/ijti.v3i2.1062
  10. Cigu, E., Agheorghiesei, D. T., Gavriluţă, A. F., & Toader, E. (2018). Transport infrastructure development, public performance and long-run economic growth: A case study for the Eu-28 Countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010067
  11. Dodi, D., & Nahdalina, N. (2019). Analisis Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Dengan Metode Discrete Choice Model (Studi Kasus: Bandara Internasional Soekarno Hatta). WARTA ARDHIA, 44(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.25104/wa.v44i2.334.81-92
  12. Fahritsani, H., Rusdarti, R., & Martitah, M. (2022). Online Transportation in the City of Semarang (Socio-Economic Studies on Online Drivers). JESS (Journal of Educational Social Studies), 11(2), 122–129.
  13. Fauzia, W., Setiadi, H., & Rizqihandari, N. (2022). Transformation of public space utilization by online motorcycle taxi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1089(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1089/1/012082
  14. Harumain, Y. A. S., Nordin, N. A., Zaid, S. M., Goh, H. C., Woodcock, A., Mcdonagh, D., Al-Rashid, M. A., & Faiz, K. (2021). Understanding Factors of Using Public Transportation Among Women in Kuala Lumpur. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 8(2), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.8.2.109-115
  15. Ija, L. (2019). Analisis Sistem Pengembangan Layanan Transportasi Online Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen di Kota Kendari. Simkom, 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.51717/simkom.v4i2.29
  16. Jaya, R., Fitria, E., Yusriana, & Ardiansyah, R. (2020). Implementasi Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Pada Agroindustri: Suatu Telaah Literatur. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 30(2), 234–343. https://doi.org/10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2020.30.2.234
  17. Karim, Z., & Fouad, J. (2018). Measuring urban public transport performance on route level: A literature review. MATEC Web of Conferences, 200(September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201820000021
  18. Khudhair, H. A., Alsadik, S. M., & Jameel, A. K. (2021). Estimation of transportation service quality for selected groups of users using customer satisfaction index. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 9(2), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.21533/PEN.V9I2.1810
  19. Kumentas, R. J. A., Rorong, I. P. F., & Maramis, M. T. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Pendapatan Driver Ojek Konvensional Dan Ojek Online Gojek (Studi Pada Driver Ojek Dan Ojek Online Di Minahasa Utara). Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 22(6), 121–132. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/jbie/article/view/43076
  20. Maliene, V., Dixon-Gough, R., & Malys, N. (2018). Dispersion of relative importance values contributes to the ranking uncertainty: Sensitivity analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making methods. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 67(1), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.003
  21. Moi, F., & Yuliana, N. P. I. (2022). Analisis Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Untuk Perjalanan Ke Kampus (Studi Kasus: Civitas Akademik Politeknik Negeri Bali). Jurnal Talenta Sipil, 5(1997), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.33087/talentasipil.v5i2.38
  22. Naibaho, Y., Lisa, N. P., & Alamsyah, W. (2023). Analisa Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Langsa–Medan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Journal of Civil Engineering, Building and Transportation, 7(1). https://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jcebt/article/view/8718%0Ahttps://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jcebt/article/download/8718/4703
  23. Ode, L., Magribi, M., Ngii, E., Ode, W., & Wunantari, A. (2019). Analisis Kinerja Angkutan Umum AKDP Kota Kendari. Prosiding Simposium Forum Studi Transportasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Ke-22, 22(November), 91–100.
  24. Raden Yeni Fitriyani, Kustiawati, D., Fanhati, I. A., Ramadhan, Y. A., & Chanifah, L. (2022). Analisis Faktor Pengaruh Elastisitas Permintaan Jasa Ojek Online DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4, 1349–1358.
  25. Rahmah, A. N., & Ningrat, N. K. (2020). Penentuan Moda Transportasi untuk Efesiensi Biaya Kirim dengan Metode AHP pada IKM Kerupuk Idaman Ciamis. Jurnal Industrial Galuh, 2(2), 71–79.
  26. Risdiyanto, Kresnanto, N. C., & Zenildo. (2019). Faktor Penentu Dalam Pemilihan Moda Angkutan Perkotaan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Simposium Forum Studi Transportasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Ke-22, November, 1–8.
  27. Seker, S., & Aydin, N. (2020). Sustainable public transportation system evaluation: A novel two-stage hybrid method based on IVIF-AHP and CODAS. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40815-019-00785-w
  28. Siryuna. (2021). Pengaruh “Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)” Pada Pemilihan Moda Trasportasi Penumpang Antara Mini Bus Dan Bus Trans Metro Deli Di Kota Medan (Studi Kasus). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Teknik (JIMT], 1(November), 1–10.
  29. Sodikin, S., Sastra, M., & Lizar, L. (2018). Analisis Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Bengkalis-Dumai. Seminar Nasional Industri Dan …, 1994, 187–196. https://snit-polbeng.org/eprosiding/index.php/snit/article/view/26
  30. Sugiyanto, S., Arnaya, I. W., Ryanto, S. S., & Surya, A. A. B. O. K. (2021). Analisa Faktor Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Teknologi Transportasi Dan Logistik, 2(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.52920/jttl.v2i1.18
  31. Sugiyarto, Purnama Dewi, D., & Junaedi, E. (2020). Pengaruh Moda Transportasi Berbasis Aplikasi Terhadap Pilihan Masyarakat Dalam Menentukan Moda Transportasi Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Pendapatan Driver Ojek Online. Jurnal Manajemen, 14(2), 138–150. http://fe.ummetro.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/JM/article/view/492
  32. Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
  33. Terziev, V., & Georgiev, M. (2018). Efficient Management as Optimization of the Organization. IJASOS- International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, IV(10), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3119900
  34. Usman, O., & Permatasari, S. D. (2020). The Effect of Service Quality, Price, Brand Image, and Promotion to Customer Satisfaction Users of Transportation Services Ojek Online. In SSRN Electronic Journal. jurnal.unpand.ac.id. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3510420
  35. Watung, M. P., Rotinsulu, D. C., & Tumangkeng, S. Y. L. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Pendapatan Ojek Konvensional Dan Ojek Online Di Kota Manado. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 20(03), 126–139. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/jbie/article/view/30946
  36. Widyarini, G., Pamungkas, W. G., & Pratiwi, Y. I. (2022). Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Saat Pandemi Covid-19 dengan Metode Promethee (Studi Kasus : Ruas Jalan Pemuda Kota Semarang). Teknika, 17(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.26623/teknika.v17i1.4666